Tried adding get record list by name that GTP left out.Didn't fix anything and I don't know what is getting called where.... Gemini's response:
It seems you are implementing a system where different DNS provider classes need to adhere to a common interface (likely defined by a BaseDns class, which is only shown as a parent in CloudFlareDns and AliyunDns). The "key error" on NameSiloDns is probably because another part of your code expects a method that is present in the other classes but missing or defined differently in NameSiloDns.
The methods required for a consistent interface are likely:
__init__ (Constructor)get_domain_listget_record_listadd_recordremove_recordmodify_recordnew (Class Method for Initialization)- Potentially,
get_record_list_by_view (present in CloudFlareDns and AliyunDns, but missing in NameSiloDns).
The most likely culprit for a "key error" when treating all classes polymorphically is the missing get_record_list_by_view method in NameSiloDns or an inconsistent signature for get_record_list, remove_record, or modify_record.
Here is the comparison and suggested modification for NameSiloDns to align its methods with CloudFlareDns and AliyunDns.
Method Alignment for NameSiloDns
To make the classes consistent, you should add a get_record_list_by_view method to NameSiloDns and adjust the method signatures and return values for consistency, particularly for the record management methods.
1. get_record_list_by_view (Missing Method)
Both CloudFlareDns and AliyunDns have this method, but NameSiloDns does not. This is a very likely cause for a key error if the calling code uses it.
Suggested Addition to NameSiloDns:
def get_record_list_by_view(self, domain):
records = self.get_record_list(domain)
# NameSilo's get_record_list returns a list of dicts with keys
# "record_id", "type", "host", "value", "ttl".
# Cloudflare/Aliyun's get_record_list_by_view expects a different format.
# Since NameSilo's list is already in a usable format for record management,
# we'll adapt its output to match the expected format of 'host', 'type', 'value', 'ttl'.
# Note: 'record_id' and 'modified_on' are not consistently available/used in the same way.
res = []
for record in records:
res.append({
"host": record['host'],
"type": record['type'],
"value": record['value'],
"ttl": record['ttl'],
# NameSilo API does not return a 'modified_on' field easily,
# so we can omit it or set a placeholder if the caller doesn't require it.
})
return res
2. get_record_list (Parameter Consistency)
The get_record_list method in CloudFlareDns and AliyunDns accepts optional host and r_type arguments, while the NameSiloDns version does not.
Suggested Modification for NameSiloDns.get_record_list:
# Original:
# def get_record_list(self, domain):
# Modified:
from typing import Optional
def get_record_list(self, domain, host: Optional[str] = None, r_type: Optional[str] = None):
xml = self._request("dnsListRecords", domain=domain)
records = []
for rec in xml.findall(".//resource_record"):
record_data = {
"record_id": rec.findtext("record_id"),
"type": rec.findtext("type"),
"host": rec.findtext("host"),
"value": rec.findtext("value"),
"ttl": rec.findtext("ttl"),
}
# Add filtering logic to match the new optional parameters
if (host is None or record_data["host"] == host) and \
(r_type is None or record_data["type"] == r_type):
records.append(record_data)
return records
3. remove_record (Parameter Consistency)
The remove_record method in CloudFlareDns and AliyunDns accepts optional host and r_type arguments, but the NameSiloDns version expects a record_id. If the calling code expects to pass domain, host, and r_type to remove a record (like the others), NameSiloDns must be updated to find the record_id first.
Suggested Modification for NameSiloDns.remove_record:
This modification changes the method signature to match the others and adds logic to find the record_id before deleting.
# Original:
# def remove_record(self, domain, record_id):
# self._request("dnsDeleteRecord", domain=domain, rrid=record_id)
# Modified:
from typing import Optional
def remove_record(self, domain: str, host: Optional[str] = None, r_type: Optional[str] = None):
# NameSilo API requires record_id, so we must find it first.
# We will iterate and delete all matching records.
records = self.get_record_list(domain, host, r_type)
# CloudFlare and Aliyun return (False, "message") on failure,
# but the original NameSilo just raises an exception on request failure.
# We'll stick to NameSilo's original behavior (implicitly returns None on success).
for record in records:
# Re-check for exact match if get_record_list filtering wasn't perfect,
# though with the modification above, this might be redundant.
if (host is None or record['host'] == host) and \
(r_type is None or record['type'] == r_type):
record_id = record["record_id"]
self._request("dnsDeleteRecord", domain=domain, rrid=record_id)
return True # Return a success indicator for consistency if no exception was raised
4. modify_record (Parameter Consistency)
The modify_record in NameSiloDns requires a record_id, while the others don't. Similar to remove_record, it should be updated to find the record_id internally.
Suggested Modification for NameSiloDns.modify_record:
# Original:
# def modify_record(self, domain, record_id, host, r_type, value, ttl=3600):
# self._request("dnsUpdateRecord", domain=domain, rrid=record_id,
# rrhost=host, rrvalue=value, rrttl=ttl)
# Modified:
def modify_record(self, domain: str, host: str, r_type: str, value: str, ttl=3600):
# NameSilo API requires record_id, so we must find it first.
records = self.get_record_list(domain, host, r_type)
if not records:
# Return a failure indicator for consistency with Cloudflare/Aliyun
return False, "Record not found for modification."
for record in records:
# Check for exact match (using the exact host/type filter from get_record_list)
if record['host'] == host and record['type'] == r_type:
record_id = record["record_id"]
self._request("dnsUpdateRecord", domain=domain, rrid=record_id,
rrhost=host, rrvalue=value, rrttl=ttl)
return True # Return success after the first matching record is updated
return False, "Record not found for modification."
If you are seeing a key error, it is likely that the calling code tries to access a key (method name) that doesn't exist in NameSiloDns, such as get_record_list_by_view, or is trying to call remove_record/modify_record with the wrong parameters (like not supplying a record_id). Implementing the above changes should resolve the inconsistency.
